A PQME evaluation is a medical-legal examination performed by a Qualified Medical Evaluator Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) A physician certified by the Division of Workers' Compensation Medical Unit to perform medical-legal evaluations in California workers' compensation cases. Click for full definition (QME) who has been selected through the Division of Workers' Compensation (DWC) panel process. When the parties in a workers' compensation dispute cannot agree on a single evaluator, the DWC Medical Unit assigns a randomized three-physician panel, and the parties use a strike process to select the evaluator. Understanding this process is essential for every QME physician, because it governs how you are assigned cases, what rules bind your communications, and what your report must contain.
What Is a PQME?
"PQME" stands for Panel Qualified Medical Evaluator. The term refers to a QME who has been selected through the DWC's panel assignment and strike process, as opposed to an Agreed Medical Evaluator Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME) A physician selected by mutual agreement between the injured worker's attorney and the claims administrator to perform a medical-legal evaluation. Click for full definition (AME) chosen by mutual agreement of the parties. Every PQME holds the same QME certification issued by the Medical Board of California; the "Panel" designation simply describes how the physician was assigned to a particular case.
The PQME process exists to ensure impartiality. By randomly generating a panel of three physicians in the relevant medical specialty and geographic area, the DWC prevents either party from hand-picking an evaluator who might favor their position. The strike process then gives both sides an equal role in narrowing the panel to a single physician.
How Does a PQME Differ from an AME?
The distinction between PQME and AME is one of the most common sources of confusion in California workers' compensation. Both evaluators perform the same type of medical-legal examination, and both produce reports that carry evidentiary weight before the WCAB Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) The judicial body that adjudicates disputes in California workers' compensation cases, including contested medical findings and benefit determinations. Click for full definition . The differences are procedural.
| Factor | PQME (Panel QME) | AME (Agreed Medical Evaluator) |
|---|---|---|
| Selection method | DWC-assigned 3-name panel with strike process | Mutual agreement between parties |
| When used | Parties cannot agree on evaluator | Parties agree on a specific physician |
| Ex parte communication | Strictly prohibited (LC §4062.3) | Strictly prohibited (LC §4062.3) |
| Applicable to | Represented and unrepresented workers | Represented workers only |
| Request form | Form 105 (unrepresented) or Form 106 (represented) | No DWC form required |
| Evidentiary presumption | Rebuttable presumption of correctness (LC §4062.2) | Generally stronger presumption in practice |
In practice, the AME process is preferred when both parties trust a particular physician's expertise and objectivity. The PQME process serves as the default when agreement is not possible, which occurs in the majority of disputed cases.
When Is a PQME Evaluation Required?
A PQME evaluation is triggered whenever there is a medical dispute in a workers' compensation case and the parties have not agreed on an AME. Under Labor Code §4062.1 (unrepresented employees) and §4062.2 (represented employees), the circumstances that initiate the panel process include:
- Disputed medical treatment: the claims administrator denies or modifies a treating physician's request for authorization based on Utilization Review (UR), and the employee objects
- Disputed compensability: disagreement over whether the injury or illness is work-related
- Disputed permanent disability: the parties disagree on the existence or degree of permanent impairment
- Disputed need for future medical care: disagreement over the applicant's need for ongoing treatment after the condition is permanent and stationary
For unrepresented injured workers, the process is initiated using DWC Form 105. The Medical Unit assigns a panel directly, and the employee selects one physician from the panel without a formal strike process. For represented injured workers, either party files Form 106, and the panel is subject to the alternating strike procedure described below. For detailed filing instructions, see our complete guide to QME panel requests .
How Does the Panel Assignment Process Work?
The DWC Medical Unit manages panel assignments through a randomized selection system. Here is how the process unfolds:
- Filing the request. The requesting party submits Form 106 (or Form 105 for unrepresented workers) to the Medical Unit, specifying the disputed medical issue and the relevant medical specialty. The form must include the employee's zip code, which determines the geographic pool of eligible QMEs.
- Specialty selection. The Medical Unit identifies the appropriate specialty for the dispute. If the parties disagree on the specialty, the Medical Unit makes the determination based on the body part or condition at issue (CCR §30).
- Panel generation. The system randomly selects three QME physicians from the relevant specialty and geographic area. Each panel is unique to the specific case and dispute. The panel list is sent to all parties simultaneously.
- Panel issuance. The Medical Unit issues the panel, typically within 20 business days of receiving a complete request. The panel assignment includes each physician's name, address, specialty, and contact information.
How Does the Strike Process Work?
The strike process is the mechanism by which the three-name panel is reduced to a single evaluator in represented cases. Under CCR Title 8 §31.1, the process works as follows:
- Determining who strikes first. The party who did not request the panel strikes first. If both parties jointly requested the panel, the employee (applicant) strikes first.
- First strike. The first-striking party eliminates one physician from the panel within 10 days of receiving the panel list. The strike must be communicated in writing to the opposing party and the Medical Unit.
- Second strike. The opposing party then eliminates one of the two remaining physicians within 8 days.
- Remaining physician. The physician who was not struck becomes the PQME for the case. This physician is obligated to accept the assignment unless a valid conflict of interest or scheduling impossibility exists.
If a party fails to exercise its strike within the allotted time, the opposing party may select the evaluator from the remaining names. This default rule incentivizes timely participation in the process.
What Are the Scheduling Requirements and Timelines?
Once the PQME is determined through the strike process (or direct selection in unrepresented cases), strict scheduling timelines apply under CCR §31.3:
- The PQME appointment must be scheduled within 60 days of the panel assignment date
- The PQME must offer the first available appointment within that 60-day window
- If the PQME cannot accommodate the appointment within 60 days, either party may request a replacement panel from the Medical Unit
- The injured worker receives priority in selecting an appointment time when multiple options are available
Physicians should note that the 60-day clock starts from the date the panel is assigned, not from the date the strike process concludes. This means the strike process itself consumes part of the scheduling window, making prompt responses essential.
| Step | Timeline | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Panel issuance | ~20 business days from Form 106 receipt | CCR §30 |
| First strike | 10 days from panel receipt | CCR §31.1 |
| Second strike | 8 days from first strike | CCR §31.1 |
| Evaluation scheduled | Within 60 days of panel assignment | CCR §31.3 |
| Report due | 30 days from examination date | LC §4062.3(c) |
| Supplemental report | 60 days from request receipt | CCR §35 |
What Happens During a PQME Evaluation?
The PQME evaluation is a comprehensive medical-legal examination QME Appointment The scheduled evaluation with a Qualified Medical Evaluator, which must occur within the timeframes specified by CCR Title 8 regulations. Click for full definition that addresses the specific medical dispute identified in the panel request. The evaluation typically includes:
- Records review. The PQME reviews all medical records submitted by the parties (see our guide to QME record submission for what to include). Under the 20-day rule, records must be served at least 20 days before the examination. The physician should document which records were reviewed and note any gaps.
- Patient history. A detailed history of the injury, symptoms, prior medical conditions, treatment received, and current functional limitations. The history should include the mechanism of injury and a thorough occupational history.
- Physical examination. A focused examination relevant to the disputed body parts or conditions, using objective clinical measurements (range of motion, strength testing, neurological examination, provocative tests).
- Diagnostic review. Analysis of imaging studies, electrodiagnostic testing, and laboratory results relevant to the dispute.
- Impairment rating. When permanent disability is at issue, the PQME rates whole person impairment Whole Person Impairment (WPI) A percentage representing the degree to which an injury or condition affects the whole person, as rated using the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. Click for full definition using the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 5th Edition .
The scope of the evaluation is limited to the issues identified in the panel request. A PQME should not address unrelated body parts or conditions unless they are directly relevant to the disputed issues; doing so may expose the report to challenge.
What Are the Communication Rules for PQME Cases?
Communication rules in PQME cases are among the strictest in California workers' compensation. Labor Code §4062.3 governs all communications between the parties and the evaluator.
Ex Parte Prohibition
In represented cases, no party may communicate with the PQME (orally or in writing) without simultaneously serving the communication on the opposing party. This includes:
- Cover letters transmitting medical records
- Requests for supplemental reports
- Questions about findings or opinions
- Scheduling communications that contain substantive case information
Permitted Communications
Certain administrative communications are permitted without simultaneous service, but only when they do not contain any substantive case information. These include basic scheduling logistics (date, time, address) and requests for directions to the office. However, many physicians err on the side of caution and require all communications to go through both parties.
Unrepresented Cases
When the injured worker is unrepresented, the ex parte restrictions are modified. The claims administrator may communicate directly with the PQME but must provide copies of all written communications to the injured worker. The physician should maintain a clear record of all communications for inclusion in the report.
What Must a PQME Report Contain?
PQME reports must comply with the same content requirements that apply to all QME medical-legal reports under CCR Title 8 §35 and §36. A complete PQME report includes:
- Date and location of the examination
- Records reviewed: a complete list of all documents reviewed, including dates and sources
- Chief complaints and history of the injury as reported by the evaluee
- Review of systems and past medical, surgical, social, and occupational history
- Physical examination findings with objective measurements
- Diagnoses with ICD-10 codes
- Causation analysis: whether the condition is industrial, and the medical reasoning supporting the determination
- Permanent and stationary status (or MMI determination)
- Impairment rating per AMA Guides with specific table and figure references
- Apportionment Apportionment The allocation of permanent disability among multiple causative factors, including industrial injury, pre-existing conditions, and non-industrial factors. Click for full definition analysis under LC §4663 and §4664
- Work restrictions and future medical care recommendations
Report Timelines
The initial report must be submitted within 30 days of the examination date (LC §4062.3(c)). If the PQME requires additional time (for example, to obtain additional diagnostic studies), the physician must notify the parties in writing and provide a revised timeline. Supplemental reports requested by either party must be completed within 60 days of receiving the request (CCR §35).
Supplemental Reports
Either party may request a supplemental report to address additional medical issues, respond to new evidence, or clarify opinions in the original report. The request must be served simultaneously on the opposing party. The PQME must address only the issues raised in the supplemental request and should not modify previously issued opinions unless presented with materially new information that warrants reconsideration.
How Do Parties Object to a Panel or Request a Replacement?
Under CCR §31.5, a party may object to the entire panel or to an individual physician on the panel under specific circumstances:
- Conflict of interest. The physician has a prior professional or personal relationship with one of the parties, or has previously evaluated the same applicant for a related claim.
- Incorrect specialty. The panel includes a physician whose specialty does not match the disputed medical condition.
- Geographic inaccessibility. A physician on the panel practices more than 150 miles from the injured worker's residence (or the applicable geographic limits under CCR §30).
- Unavailability. The selected PQME cannot schedule the evaluation within the 60-day window.
Objections must be filed in writing with the Medical Unit within 10 days of receiving the panel list. The Medical Unit reviews the objection and, if it finds merit, issues a replacement panel. If the objection is denied, the original panel stands and the strike process proceeds.
Physicians who are struck from a panel have no role in the subsequent proceedings. However, a QME who appears on a panel and is selected should verify that no conflicts exist before accepting the assignment. Discovering a conflict after the evaluation has begun creates significant procedural complications for all parties.
Key Takeaways for 2026 QME Practice
- A PQME is a QME selected from a DWC-assigned panel; it is a selection method, not a separate credential
- The panel consists of three randomly selected QME physicians in the relevant specialty and geographic area
- In represented cases, the parties use an alternating strike process to select the evaluator (CCR §31.1)
- The evaluation must be scheduled within 60 days of panel assignment (CCR §31.3)
- Ex parte communication is prohibited in represented cases (LC §4062.3); all communications must be served on both parties
- The initial report is due within 30 days of the examination; supplemental reports within 60 days of the request
- Panels can be objected to within 10 days for conflicts, incorrect specialty, or geographic inaccessibility
IMEPro helps physicians manage PQME assignments efficiently with automated record tracking, communication logging, and report-writing tools that ensure compliance with CCR and Labor Code requirements. Learn more at our physician platform overview.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between a PQME and an AME?
A PQME (Panel Qualified Medical Evaluator) is a QME selected from a three-name panel assigned by the DWC Medical Unit when the parties cannot agree on a single evaluator. An AME (Agreed Medical Evaluator) is a physician chosen by mutual agreement between the applicant's attorney and the defense. The key distinction is selection method: PQMEs are assigned through a randomized panel and strike process, while AMEs are negotiated. Both must hold active QME certification, and both produce reports that carry equal evidentiary weight before the WCAB.
Can a party object to all three physicians on a PQME panel?
Yes, but only under specific circumstances defined in CCR Title 8 section 31.5. A party may object to the entire panel if one or more physicians on the panel has a conflict of interest, does not practice in the appropriate specialty for the disputed condition, or is geographically inaccessible (more than 150 miles from the employee's residence). If the Medical Unit determines the objection is valid, it will issue a replacement panel. Objections must be filed in writing within 10 days of receiving the panel list.
What happens if the PQME appointment is not scheduled within 60 days?
Under CCR section 31.3, the evaluation must be scheduled within 60 days of the panel assignment. If the selected PQME cannot accommodate the appointment within that window, the parties may request a replacement panel from the Medical Unit. In practice, the 60-day deadline is measured from the date the panel issues, and failure to schedule within this period can result in the assignment of a new panel at either party's request.
Who is responsible for sending medical records to the PQME?
In represented cases, each party is responsible for serving relevant medical records on the PQME at least 20 days before the evaluation, with simultaneous service on the opposing party (Labor Code section 4062.3). In unrepresented cases, the claims administrator must provide all relevant medical records directly to the PQME. The physician should not begin the evaluation if essential records have not been received, as an incomplete record review can compromise the report's evidentiary value.
Can a PQME communicate directly with one party without the other present?
No. Labor Code section 4062.3 strictly prohibits ex parte communication with a PQME in represented cases. All written and oral communications must be served simultaneously on both parties. Violations of the ex parte rule can result in disqualification of the PQME and potential disciplinary action by the Medical Board. In unrepresented cases, the claims administrator may communicate directly with the PQME, but must provide copies of all written communications to the injured worker.